Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedJul 2024Unknown

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window, while Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct has a 128,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct supports vision.