Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Llama 4 Scout wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 4 Scout
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 4 Scout
Speed
Llama 4 Scout

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 4 ScoutWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$4.00$0.08 Llama 4 Scout
Output (per 1M tokens)$4.00$0.30 Llama 4 Scout
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 4 Scout is 97% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Providers

Hyperbolic $4.00 (Cheapest)
Google $5.00

Llama 4 Scout Providers

DeepInfra $0.08 (Cheapest)
Friendli $0.10
Vercel $0.10
Groq $0.11
Novita $0.18

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
3
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Wins
4
Llama 4 Scout Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 4 ScoutWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.213.5
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
14.56.7
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
3.014.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.275.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
51.558.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
30.529.9
Aider
Real-world code editing
66.2--
AIME
Competition math
21.328.3
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
131,000
tokens
Llama 4 Scout
327,680
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Llama 4 Scout has a 60% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 4 ScoutWinner
Tokens/second25.2 tok/s156.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.79s0.49s
Llama 4 Scout responds 520% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 4 Scout
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 4 Scout
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedJul 2024Apr 2025

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 4 Scout Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 405B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 4 Scout with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 4 Scout has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.5, compared to Llama 4 Scout's score of 6.7.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window, while Llama 4 Scout has a 327,680 token context window.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 4 Scout supports vision.