Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Llama 4 Scout wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 4 Scout
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 4 Scout
Speed
Llama 4 Scout

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 4 Scout
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 4 Scout
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedJul 2024Apr 2025

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 4 Scout Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 405B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 4 Scout with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 4 Scout has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.5, compared to Llama 4 Scout's score of 6.7.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window, while Llama 4 Scout has a 327,680 token context window.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 4 Scout supports vision.