Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Phind CodeLlama 34B Python v1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

Phind CodeLlama 34B Python v1 wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 405B InstructPhind CodeLlama 34B Python v1Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.90$0.90Tie
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.90$0.90Tie
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.45$0.45Tie
Both models have similar overall pricing.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Phind CodeLlama 34B Python v1 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Wins
0
Phind CodeLlama 34B Python v1 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405B InstructPhind CodeLlama 34B Python v1Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
17.4--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
14.5--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
3.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.2--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
51.5--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
30.5--
Aider
Real-world code editing
66.2--
AIME
Competition math
21.3--
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
131,000
tokens
Phind CodeLlama 34B Python v1
N/A
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.1 405B InstructPhind CodeLlama 34B Python v1Winner
Tokens/second30.4 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.68sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405B InstructPhind CodeLlama 34B Python v1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 405B InstructPhind CodeLlama 34B Python v1
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedJul 2024Unknown

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Phind CodeLlama 34B Python v1 Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 405B Instruct with:

Compare Phind CodeLlama 34B Python v1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.5, compared to Phind CodeLlama 34B Python v1's score of N/A.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window, while Phind CodeLlama 34B Python v1 has a unknown token context window.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision. Phind CodeLlama 34B Python v1 does not support vision.
Advertise with us