Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 405B InstructMistral NemoWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.90$0.02 Mistral Nemo
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.90$0.04 Mistral Nemo
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.45$0.01 Mistral Nemo
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Nemo is 97% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Mistral Nemo Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
2
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Wins
1
Mistral Nemo Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405B InstructMistral NemoWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
17.425.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
14.5--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
3.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.226.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
51.58.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
30.5--
Aider
Real-world code editing
66.2--
AIME
Competition math
21.3--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-36.1-
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
131,000
tokens
Mistral Nemo
131,072
tokens
Mistral Nemo has a 0% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.1 405B InstructMistral NemoWinner
Tokens/second33.7 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.71sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405B InstructMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 405B InstructMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMistral AI
ReleasedJul 2024Jul 2024

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 405B Instruct with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.5, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.