Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.90$0.10 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.90$0.40 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.45N/A Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 81% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
6
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Wins
1
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
17.414.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
14.510.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
3.08.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.269.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
51.548.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
30.529.0
Aider
Real-world code editing
66.2--
AIME
Competition math
21.313.7
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins 6 out of 8 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
131,000
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 0% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Tokens/second33.7 tok/s82.7 tok/s
Time to First Token0.71s0.24s
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 responds 146% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 405B InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaNvidia
ReleasedJul 2024Oct 2025

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 405B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.5, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.