Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Nemotron Nano 9B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 405B InstructNemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.90$0.04 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.90$0.16 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.45$0.10 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is 92% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
2
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Wins
4
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405B InstructNemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
17.413.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
14.57.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
3.062.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.273.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
51.555.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
30.570.1
Aider
Real-world code editing
66.2--
AIME
Competition math
21.3--
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
131,000
tokens
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
131,072
tokens
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 0% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.1 405B InstructNemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Tokens/second33.7 tok/s137.2 tok/s
Time to First Token0.71s0.53s
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 responds 307% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405B InstructNemotron Nano 9B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 405B InstructNemotron Nano 9B V2
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaNvidia
ReleasedJul 2024Sep 2025

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 405B Instruct with:

Compare Nemotron Nano 9B V2 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.5, compared to Nemotron Nano 9B V2's score of 7.5.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision.