Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Context Window
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405B InstructNemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 405B InstructNemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaNvidia
ReleasedJul 2024Unknown

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has cheaper output pricing at $0.50/M tokens.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.2, compared to Llama 3.1 405B Instruct's score of 14.5.