Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Z-ai

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs GLM-5V Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GLM-5V Turbo wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5V Turbo
Context Window
GLM-5V Turbo
Speed
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405B InstructGLM-5V Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 405B InstructGLM-5V Turbo
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaZ-ai
ReleasedJul 2024Apr 2026

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-5V Turbo Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
GLM-5V Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.2, compared to Llama 3.1 405B Instruct's score of 14.5.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window, while GLM-5V Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision. GLM-5V Turbo supports vision.