Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.1 405B (base) vs GPT-5.4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 405B (base) wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.4 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B (base)
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.4
Context Window
GPT-5.4
Speed
GPT-5.4

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 405B (base)GPT-5.4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 405B (base)GPT-5.4
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaOpenAI
ReleasedAug 2024Mar 2026

Llama 3.1 405B (base) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.4 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.4 has cheaper input pricing at $2.50/M tokens. Llama 3.1 405B (base) has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 405B (base) has a 32,768 token context window, while GPT-5.4 has a 1,050,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 405B (base) does not support vision. GPT-5.4 supports vision.