Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 1B vs GPT-5.1-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 1B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 1B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.1-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.1-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.1-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 70B Instruct 1BGPT-5.1-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 70B Instruct 1BGPT-5.1-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownNov 2025

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 1B Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.1-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 1B has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 1B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 1B has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 1B does not support vision. GPT-5.1-Codex supports vision.