Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct wins:

  • Better at coding

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 70B InstructLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.10 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.32 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 61% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Providers

Novita $0.34 (Cheapest)
Hyperbolic $0.40
DeepInfra $0.40
Together $0.88

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Providers

DeepInfra $0.10 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.14
Parasail $0.22
Nebius $0.25
Crusoe $0.25

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Wins
7
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
12.214.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.910.7-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
4.07.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
67.671.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
40.949.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
23.228.8
Aider
Real-world code editing
58.659.4
AIME
Competition math
17.330.0
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins 7 out of 8 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.1 70B InstructLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/second42.8 tok/s104.4 tok/s
Time to First Token0.46s0.49s
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct responds 144% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 70B InstructLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 70B InstructLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedJul 2024Dec 2024

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 70B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.9, compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's score of 10.7.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision.