Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaOpenAI
ReleasedJul 2024Feb 2026

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 70B Instruct with:

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.34/M tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.39/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's score of 10.9.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct does not support vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.