Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs GPT-5.4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

GPT-5.4 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.4
Context Window
GPT-5.4
Speed
GPT-5.4

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5.4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5.4
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaOpenAI
ReleasedJul 2024Mar 2026

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.4 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.34/M tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.39/M tokens.
GPT-5.4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.0, compared to Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's score of 10.9.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5.4 has a 1,050,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct does not support vision. GPT-5.4 supports vision.