Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaXiaomi
ReleasedJul 2024Mar 2026

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 70B Instruct with:

Compare MiMo v2 Omni with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.34/M tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.39/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's score of 10.9.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.