Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3.1 70B vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 70B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 70B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
MiMo v2 Omni

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 70BMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 70BMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaXiaomi
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Llama 3.1 70B Modalities

Input
Output

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Llama 3.1 70B has cheaper output pricing at $0.72/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 70B has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.1 70B does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.