Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 8B InstructMistral NemoWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.02$0.02Tie
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.04 Mistral Nemo
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Nemo is 9% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Providers

Nebius $0.02 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.02 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.02 (Cheapest)
Groq $0.05
SiliconFlow $0.06

Mistral Nemo Providers

Chutes $0.02 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.02 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.04
Mistral $0.15
Azure $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
2
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Wins
1
Mistral Nemo Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMistral NemoWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
11.725.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
4.9--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
4.3--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
47.626.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
25.98.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
11.6--
Aider
Real-world code editing
37.6--
AIME
Competition math
7.7--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-36.1-
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins 2 out of 9 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
16,384
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Mistral Nemo
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Mistral Nemo has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.1 8B InstructMistral NemoWinner
Tokens/second162.2 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.33sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 8B InstructMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 8B InstructMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMistral AI
ReleasedJul 2024Jul 2024

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 8B Instruct with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 4.9, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a 16,384 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.