Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 8B InstructGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 8B InstructGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaOpenAI
ReleasedJul 2024Jan 2026

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
GPT-5.2-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's score of 4.9.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a 16,384 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not support vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.