Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Sao10k

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 8B InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 8B InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaSao10k
ReleasedJul 2024Aug 2024

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a 16,384 token context window, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision.