Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.10 Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.32 Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct is 68% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Providers

Cloudflare $0.05 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.05 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.06
Together $0.18

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Providers

DeepInfra $0.10 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.14
Parasail $0.22
Nebius $0.25
Crusoe $0.25

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Wins
7
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
10.914.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
4.310.7
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
1.77.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
46.471.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
22.149.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
11.028.8
Aider
Real-world code editing
-59.4-
AIME
Competition math
9.330.0
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/second69.7 tok/s104.4 tok/s
Time to First Token0.41s0.49s
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct responds 50% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedSep 2024Dec 2024

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.7, compared to Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct's score of 4.3.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision.