Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs Llama 4 Maverick

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 4 MaverickWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.15 Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.60 Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct is 81% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Providers

Cloudflare $0.05 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.05 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.06
Together $0.18

Llama 4 Maverick Providers

DeepInfra $0.15 (Cheapest)
Vercel $0.20
Groq $0.20
Together $0.27
Novita $0.27

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Wins
7
Llama 4 Maverick Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 4 MaverickWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
10.918.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
4.315.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
1.719.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
46.480.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
22.167.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
11.039.7
Aider
Real-world code editing
-15.6-
AIME
Competition math
9.339.0
Llama 4 Maverick significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Llama 4 Maverick
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Llama 4 Maverick has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 4 MaverickWinner
Tokens/second69.7 tok/s128.6 tok/s
Time to First Token0.41s0.46s
Llama 4 Maverick responds 84% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 4 Maverick
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 4 Maverick
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedSep 2024Apr 2025

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct with:

Compare Llama 4 Maverick with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.6, compared to Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct's score of 4.3.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision. Llama 4 Maverick supports vision.