Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs Llama 4 Scout

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Llama 4 Scout wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 4 Scout
Context Window
Llama 4 Scout
Speed
Llama 4 Scout

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 4 Scout
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 4 Scout
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedSep 2024Apr 2025

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 4 Scout Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 4 Scout scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 6.7, compared to Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct's score of 4.3.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 4 Scout has a 327,680 token context window.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision. Llama 4 Scout supports vision.