Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaMinimax
ReleasedSep 2024Mar 2026

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.06/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct's score of 4.2.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.