Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs GPT-5 Nano

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

112 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5 Nano wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5 Nano
Context Window
GPT-5 Nano
Speed
GPT-5 Nano

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-5 NanoWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.05 Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.40 Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.10$0.01 GPT-5 Nano
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct is 64% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Providers

No provider data available

GPT-5 Nano Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Wins
6
GPT-5 Nano Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-5 NanoWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
8.713.8
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
4.314.2
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
1.727.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
46.455.6
GPQA
Graduate-level science
22.142.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
11.047.0
AIME
Competition math
9.3--
GPT-5 Nano significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
131,072
tokens
GPT-5 Nano
400,000
tokens
GPT-5 Nano has a 67% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-5 NanoWinner
Tokens/second86.7 tok/s141.6 tok/s
Time to First Token0.41s0.62s
GPT-5 Nano responds 63% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-5 Nano
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-5 Nano
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaOpenAI
ReleasedSep 2024Aug 2025

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GPT-5 Nano Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct with:

Compare GPT-5 Nano with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
GPT-5 Nano scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.2, compared to Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct's score of 4.3.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5 Nano has a 400,000 token context window.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision. GPT-5 Nano supports vision.