Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs GPT-OSS-120b

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
GPT-OSS-120b
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-OSS-120bWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.04 GPT-OSS-120b
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.19 Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct is 36% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Providers

Cloudflare $0.05 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.05 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.06
Together $0.18

GPT-OSS-120b Providers

Chutes $0.04 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.05
Novita $0.05
Clarifai $0.09
Google $0.09

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Wins
6
GPT-OSS-120b Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-OSS-120bWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
10.933.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
4.328.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
1.793.4
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
46.480.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
22.178.2
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
11.087.8
Aider
Real-world code editing
-41.8-
AIME
Competition math
9.3--
GPT-OSS-120b significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
GPT-OSS-120b
131,072
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-OSS-120bWinner
Tokens/second69.7 tok/s311.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.41s0.47s
GPT-OSS-120b responds 347% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-OSS-120b
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-OSS-120b
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaOpenAI
ReleasedSep 2024Aug 2025

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct with:

Compare GPT-OSS-120b with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
GPT-OSS-120b scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.6, compared to Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct's score of 4.3.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision. GPT-OSS-120b does not support vision.