Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs GPT-OSS-120b

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
GPT-OSS-120b
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-OSS-120b
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructGPT-OSS-120b
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaOpenAI
ReleasedSep 2024Aug 2025

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
GPT-OSS-120b scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.5, compared to Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct's score of 4.3.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision. GPT-OSS-120b supports vision.