Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Sao10k

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaSao10k
ReleasedSep 2024Aug 2024

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3 8B Lunaris has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window.
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct supports vision. Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision.