Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 11B Vision InstructMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaXiaomi
ReleasedSep 2024Unknown

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct's score of 4.3.