Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.03$0.10 Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.20$0.32 Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 55% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct Providers

Novita $0.02 (Cheapest)
Cloudflare $0.03

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Providers

DeepInfra $0.10 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.14
Parasail $0.22
Nebius $0.25
Crusoe $0.25

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct Wins
7
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
9.114.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
0.610.7
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
0.07.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
20.071.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
19.649.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
1.928.8
Aider
Real-world code editing
-59.4-
AIME
Competition math
0.030.0
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
60,000
tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 54% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/second75.9 tok/s104.4 tok/s
Time to First Token0.45s0.49s
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct responds 37% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 1B InstructLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedSep 2024Dec 2024

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.2 1B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Llama 3.2 1B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.7, compared to Llama 3.2 1B Instruct's score of 0.6.
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct has a 60,000 token context window, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision.