Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Sao10k

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 3B InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 3B InstructLlama 3 8B Lunaris
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaSao10k
ReleasedSep 2024Aug 2024

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.2 3B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3 8B Lunaris with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Llama 3 8B Lunaris's score of N/A.
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has a 80,000 token context window, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window.
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision.