Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 90B Vision InstructMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 90B Vision InstructMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaMinimax
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.