Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 90B Vision InstructMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 90B Vision InstructMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaXiaomi
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct supports vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.