Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Z-ai

Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct vs GLM 5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

GLM 5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 5
Context Window
GLM 5
Speed
GLM 5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.2 90B Vision InstructGLM 5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.2 90B Vision InstructGLM 5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaZ-ai
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

GLM 5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM 5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.72/M tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while GLM 5 has a 202,752 token context window.
Llama 3.2 90B Vision Instruct supports vision. GLM 5 does not support vision.