Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.60 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.32$1.20 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.13N/A Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 79% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Wins
0
Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.5--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.7--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
7.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
71.3--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
49.8--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
28.8--
Aider
Real-world code editing
59.4--
AIME
Competition math
30.0--
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4
N/A
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4Winner
Tokens/second101.3 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.53sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedDec 2024Unknown

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.7, compared to Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4's score of N/A.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 has a unknown token context window.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 does not support vision.
Advertise with us