Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Llama 4 Maverick

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 4 Maverick
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 4 Maverick
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedDec 2024Apr 2025

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.6, compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's score of 10.7.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 4 Maverick supports vision.