Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Microsoft
Microsoft

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

WizardLM-2 8x22B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.3 70B InstructWizardLM-2 8x22BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.62 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.32$0.62 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.13N/A Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 75% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

WizardLM-2 8x22B Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
3
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Wins
1
WizardLM-2 8x22B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructWizardLM-2 8x22BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.533.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.7--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
7.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
71.340.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
49.817.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
28.8--
Aider
Real-world code editing
59.444.4
AIME
Competition math
30.0--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-48.6-
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
WizardLM-2 8x22B
65,535
tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.3 70B InstructWizardLM-2 8x22BWinner
Tokens/second99.5 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.54sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70B InstructWizardLM-2 8x22B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 70B InstructWizardLM-2 8x22B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMicrosoft
ReleasedDec 2024Apr 2024

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

WizardLM-2 8x22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with:

Compare WizardLM-2 8x22B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.7, compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's score of N/A.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while WizardLM-2 8x22B has a 65,535 token context window.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision. WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support vision.