Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 70B InstructMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMistral AI
ReleasedDec 2024Jul 2024

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.03/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.