Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.90 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.32$0.90 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.13$0.45 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 83% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
6
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Wins
1
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.513.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.710.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
7.711.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
71.369.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
49.846.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
28.816.9
Aider
Real-world code editing
59.454.9
AIME
Competition math
30.024.7
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins 6 out of 8 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/second99.5 tok/s35.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.54s0.51s
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct responds 180% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 70B InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaNvidia
ReleasedDec 2024Oct 2024

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.8, compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's score of 10.7.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision.