Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70B InstructMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 70B InstructMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaXiaomi
ReleasedDec 2024Mar 2026

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's score of 10.7.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.