Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Z-ai

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs GLM 5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GLM 5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 5
Context Window
GLM 5
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70B InstructGLM 5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 70B InstructGLM 5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaZ-ai
ReleasedDec 2024Feb 2026

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
GLM 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 39.0, compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's score of 10.7.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while GLM 5 has a 202,752 token context window.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision. GLM 5 does not support vision.