Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Z-ai

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
GLM-5 Turbo
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 70B InstructGLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 70B InstructGLM-5 Turbo
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaZ-ai
ReleasedDec 2024Mar 2026

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
GLM-5 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.8, compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's score of 10.7.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.