Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
MiMo v2 Omni

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4MiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4MiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaXiaomi
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 Modalities

Input
Output

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.3 Swallow 70B Instruct v0.4 does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.