Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Llama 4 Scout wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Llama 4 Scout
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Llama 4 Scout

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 4 MaverickLlama 4 ScoutWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.08 Llama 4 Scout
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.60$0.30 Llama 4 Scout
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 4 Scout is 49% cheaper overall.

Llama 4 Maverick Providers

DeepInfra $0.15 (Cheapest)
Vercel $0.20
Groq $0.20
Together $0.27
Novita $0.27

Llama 4 Scout Providers

DeepInfra $0.08 (Cheapest)
Friendli $0.10
Vercel $0.10
Groq $0.11
Novita $0.18

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
7
Llama 4 Maverick Wins
0
Llama 4 Scout Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickLlama 4 ScoutWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
18.313.5
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
15.66.7
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
19.314.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
80.975.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
67.158.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
39.729.9
Aider
Real-world code editing
15.6--
AIME
Competition math
39.028.3
Llama 4 Maverick significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 4 Maverick
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 4 Maverick
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Llama 4 Scout
327,680
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Llama 4 Maverick has a 69% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 4 MaverickLlama 4 ScoutWinner
Tokens/second128.6 tok/s156.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.46s0.49s
Llama 4 Scout responds 21% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Scout
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Scout
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedApr 2025Apr 2025

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 4 Scout Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 4 Maverick with:

Compare Llama 4 Scout with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 4 Scout has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.6, compared to Llama 4 Scout's score of 6.7.
Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Llama 4 Scout has a 327,680 token context window.
Llama 4 Maverick supports vision. Llama 4 Scout supports vision.