Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Llama 4 Maverick vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 4 MaverickMiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMinimax
ReleasedApr 2025Feb 2026

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 4 Maverick with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 4 Maverick has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Llama 4 Maverick's score of 15.6.
Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window.
Llama 4 Maverick supports vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.