Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 4 MaverickLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.10 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.60$0.40 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 33% cheaper overall.

Llama 4 Maverick Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
7
Llama 4 Maverick Wins
0
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
18.414.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
15.610.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
19.38.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
80.969.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
67.148.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
39.729.0
Aider
Real-world code editing
15.6--
AIME
Competition math
39.013.7
Llama 4 Maverick significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 4 Maverick
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 4 Maverick
1,048,576
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
Llama 4 Maverick has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 4 MaverickLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Tokens/second129.9 tok/s82.7 tok/s
Time to First Token0.47s0.24s
Llama 4 Maverick responds 57% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 4 MaverickLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaNvidia
ReleasedApr 2025Oct 2025

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 4 Maverick with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.6, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 4 Maverick supports vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.