Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Llama 4 Maverick vs Nemotron Nano 9B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 4 MaverickNemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.04 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.60$0.16 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.10 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is 73% cheaper overall.

Llama 4 Maverick Providers

No provider data available

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
4
Llama 4 Maverick Wins
2
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickNemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
18.413.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
15.67.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
19.362.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
80.973.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
67.155.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
39.770.1
Aider
Real-world code editing
15.6--
AIME
Competition math
39.0--
Llama 4 Maverick significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 4 Maverick
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 4 Maverick
1,048,576
tokens
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
131,072
tokens
Llama 4 Maverick has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 4 MaverickNemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Tokens/second129.9 tok/s137.2 tok/s
Time to First Token0.47s0.53s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickNemotron Nano 9B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 4 MaverickNemotron Nano 9B V2
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaNvidia
ReleasedApr 2025Sep 2025

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 4 Maverick with:

Compare Nemotron Nano 9B V2 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.6, compared to Nemotron Nano 9B V2's score of 7.5.
Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 4 Maverick supports vision. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision.