Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Llama 4 Maverick vs Nemotron Nano 9B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickNemotron Nano 9B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 4 MaverickNemotron Nano 9B V2
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaNvidia
ReleasedApr 2025Sep 2025

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.6, compared to Nemotron Nano 9B V2's score of 7.5.
Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 4 Maverick supports vision. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision.