Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 4 Maverick vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 MaverickMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 4 MaverickMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaXiaomi
ReleasedApr 2025Dec 2025

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Llama 4 Maverick's score of 15.6.
Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 4 Maverick supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.