Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Scout wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 4 Scout
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Context Window
Llama 4 Scout
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 ScoutNemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 4 ScoutNemotron-3 Super 120B A12B
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaNvidia
ReleasedApr 2025Unknown

Llama 4 Scout Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 4 Scout with:

Compare Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 4 Scout has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. Llama 4 Scout has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.2, compared to Llama 4 Scout's score of 6.7.
Llama 4 Scout has a 327,680 token context window, while Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has a unknown token context window.
Llama 4 Scout supports vision. Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B does not support vision.