Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Scout wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 4 Scout
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
Llama 4 Scout
Speed
Llama 4 Scout

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 4 ScoutMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.08$0.09 Llama 4 Scout
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.29 MiMo-V2-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$45000.00 MiMo-V2-Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 4 Scout is 4% cheaper overall.

Llama 4 Scout Providers

DeepInfra $0.08 (Cheapest)
Friendli $0.10
Vercel $0.10
Groq $0.11
Novita $0.18

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
1
Llama 4 Scout Wins
5
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.530.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
6.725.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
14.067.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
75.274.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
58.765.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
29.940.2
AIME
Competition math
28.3--
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 4 Scout
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 4 Scout
327,680
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
Llama 4 Scout has a 20% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 4 ScoutMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second156.0 tok/s142.6 tok/s
Time to First Token0.49s1.25s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 4 ScoutMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 4 ScoutMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaXiaomi
ReleasedApr 2025Dec 2025

Llama 4 Scout Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 4 Scout with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 4 Scout has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Llama 4 Scout's score of 6.7.
Llama 4 Scout has a 327,680 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 4 Scout supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.