Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricPhi-3 Medium 128K InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$1.00$0.90 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.00$0.90 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.45 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 10% cheaper overall.

Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
1
Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct Wins
2
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkPhi-3 Medium 128K InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
32.013.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-11.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
41.269.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
11.546.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-16.9-
Aider
Real-world code editing
-54.9-
AIME
Competition math
-24.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
48.5--
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct
128,000
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 2% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricPhi-3 Medium 128K InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A35.5 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.51s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeaturePhi-3 Medium 128K InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyPhi-3 Medium 128K InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMicrosoftNvidia
ReleasedUnknownOct 2024

Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.8, compared to Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct's score of N/A.
Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision.