Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Context Window
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricPhi-3 Medium 128K InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$1.00$0.10 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.00$0.40 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 83% cheaper overall.

Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct Wins
2
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkPhi-3 Medium 128K InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
32.014.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.5-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-8.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
41.269.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
11.548.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-29.0-
AIME
Competition math
-13.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
48.5--
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct
128,000
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 2% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricPhi-3 Medium 128K InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Tokens/secondN/A82.7 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.24s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeaturePhi-3 Medium 128K InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyPhi-3 Medium 128K InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMicrosoftNvidia
ReleasedUnknownOct 2025

Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.5, compared to Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct's score of N/A.
Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
Phi-3 Medium 128K Instruct does not support vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.