Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Microsoft
Microsoft
vs
Microsoft
Microsoft

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window

WizardLM-2 8x22B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Context Window
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeaturePhi-3 Mini 128K InstructWizardLM-2 8x22B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyPhi-3 Mini 128K InstructWizardLM-2 8x22B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMicrosoftMicrosoft
ReleasedUnknownApr 2024

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

WizardLM-2 8x22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct with:

Compare WizardLM-2 8x22B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to WizardLM-2 8x22B's score of N/A.
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while WizardLM-2 8x22B has a 65,535 token context window.
Phi-3 Mini 128K Instruct does not support vision. WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support vision.